|
|
better in the flesh
|
wow. I don't normally notice much difference, but I have to say that
I've just seen a (blue) Triumph Sprint ST 1050, and it's incredibly
better looking than in pictures, and a vast improvement on the old
|
Pretty much what most people at work said.....
|
Bit slow though...
|
True, true
Specially when I'm riding it....
|
|
|
Sprint.
|
I had the same reaction when I first saw a 675 in the flesh. It must
|
Now the 675 is stunning - visitor at work arrived on one a couple of
weeks ago. It's just *so* pretty.
If they did a big engined version it would be even better.
|
Assuming that the rumour mill is correct, and that they make one in 2008,
that'll be the next bike. If I can hold off getting a speed triple in the
meantime.
|
If it looks that good, and it's swift, and I had a garage to put it in,
I'd have one like a shot.
|
|
|
be a Triumph thing.
|
yours, impressed.
|
I don't especially like the look of them, but weirdly I see more of them
on my drive into work, through the centre of London, than any other sort
of bike. One day this week I saw no fewer than 8, in one journey.
|
|
|